Agreement No. CE 23/2012
(EP)
Environmental Monitoring and Audit
for Contaminated Mud Pits at the South of The Brothers and at East Sha Chau (2012-2017)
- Investigation
9TH MONTHLY
PROGRESS REPORT FOR May 2013
1.1.1
Since early 1990s, contaminated sediment ([1])
arising from various construction works in Hong Kong has been disposed
of at a series of seabed pits at East of Sha Chau (ESC). In late 2008, a review indicated that the
existing and planned facilities at ESC would not be able to meet the disposal
demand after 2012. In order to meet this
demand, the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government (HKSARG) decided
to implement a new contained aquatic disposal (CAD) ([2])
facility at the South of The Brothers (SB CMPs) (hereafter referred to
as “the Project”) which had been under consideration for a number of years.
1.1.2
The environmental acceptability of the
construction and operation of the Project had been confirmed by findings of the
associated Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) study completed in 2005 under Agreement No. CE
12/2002(EP) ([3]).
The Director of Environmental Protection (DEP) approved this EIA report
under the Environmental
Impact Assessment Ordinance (Cap. 499) (EIAO) in
September 2005 (EIA Register No.: AEIAR-089/2005).
1.1.3
In accordance with the EIA
recommendation, prior to commencement of construction works for the SB CMPs,
the Civil Engineering and Development Department (CEDD) undertook a detailed
review and update of the EIA findings for the SB site ([4]). Findings of the EIA review undertaken in
2009/ 2010 confirmed that the construction and operation of the SB site had
been predicted to be environmentally acceptable.
1.1.4
An Environmental Permit (EP-427/2011) was
issued by the Environmental Protection Department (EPD) to the CEDD, the Permit
Holder, on 3 November 2011 and varied on 23 December 2011 (EP-427/2011/A). Under the requirements of Condition 4 of
the EP (EP-427/2011/A), an
Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) programme as set out in the
EM&A Manual () is
required to be implemented for the SB CMPs.
The present EM&A programme undertaken under Agreement No. CE 23/2012 (EP)
covers the dredging, disposal and capping operations of the SB CMPs.
1.2
Reporting Period
1.2.1
This Monthly Progress Report covers the EM&A
activities for the reporting month of May 2013.
1.3
Details of Sampling and Laboratory Testing Activities
1.3.1
Impact Water Quality Monitoring during Dredging
Operations of CMP 1 was conducted three times per week
(ie 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 13, 15, 18, 20, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31 May 2013) in this
reporting month in accordance with the EM&A Manual.
1.4.1
No outstanding sampling remained from May 2013.
Laboratory analysis of Suspended Solids (SS) collected after 25 May 2013
was still in progress during the preparation of this monthly report. A summary of field activities conducted are
presented in Annex A.
1.5.1
Monitoring data collected for SB
CMPs from 26 April to 25 May 2013 are presented in this monthly report. Detailed discussion will be presented in the
corresponding Quarterly Report.
1.5.2
Impact Water Quality Monitoring during Dredging Operations of CMP 1 – April
and May 2013
1.5.3
Impact Water Quality Monitoring during Dredging
Operations of CMP 1 was conducted three times per week
for a total of thirteen (13) sampling days from 26 April to 25 May 2013. On each survey day, sampling was conducted
during both mid-ebb and mid-flood tides at two Reference (Upstream) stations
upstream and five Impact (Downstream) stations downstream of the dredging
operations at CMP 1. Monitoring was also
conducted at five Sensitive Receiver Stations (Ma Wan, Shum Shui Kok, Tai Mo To
and Tai Ho Bay). A total of twelve
stations were monitored and locations of the sampling stations are shown in Figure 1.1.
1.5.4
Monitoring results from 26 April to
25 May 2013 are presented in Table B1 of Annex B. It should be noted that
sampling at station THB2 during mid-flood tide on 8 May 2013, during mid-ebb
tide on 10 May 2013 and during both mid-flood and mid-ebb tides on 25 May 2013
were not carried out due to adverse weather.
Levels of Dissolved Oxygen (DO), Turbidity and SS at most of the
stations generally complied with the Action and Limit Levels (see Table B2 for details) set in the Baseline Monitoring Report (), except for the following occasions of exceedances shown in Table 1.1 below.
Table 1.1 Details
of exceedances recorded at CMP 1 between 26 April and 25 May 2013
Date
|
Tide
|
Parameter
|
Station
|
Type
|
26
April 2013
|
Flood
|
Turbidity
|
DS4
|
Action
|
26
April 2013
|
Flood
|
Turbidity
|
DS5
|
Action
|
26
April 2013
|
Ebb
|
SS
|
WSR46
|
Action
|
26
April 2013
|
Flood
|
SS
|
DS3
|
Action
|
26
April 2013
|
Flood
|
SS
|
DS4
|
Limit
|
26
April 2013
|
Flood
|
SS
|
DS5
|
Action
|
29
April 2013
|
Ebb
|
SS
|
WSR46
|
Action
|
29
April 2013
|
Flood
|
SS
|
WSR46
|
Action
|
2
May 2013
|
Ebb
|
Turbidity
|
DS1
|
Action
|
2
May 2013
|
Ebb
|
SS
|
DS1
|
Action
|
2
May 2013
|
Flood
|
SS
|
DS2
|
Action
|
6
May 2013
|
Ebb
|
SS
|
DS1
|
Action
|
8
May 2013
|
Flood
|
SS
|
DS3
|
Action
|
8
May 2013
|
Flood
|
SS
|
DS4
|
Action
|
8
May 2013
|
Flood
|
SS
|
DS5
|
Action
|
10
May 2013
|
Ebb
|
SS
|
DS2
|
Action
|
10
May 2013
|
Flood
|
SS
|
DS2
|
Action
|
10
May 2013
|
Flood
|
SS
|
WSR45C
|
Action
|
10
May 2013
|
Flood
|
SS
|
WSR46
|
Action
|
13
May 2013
|
Ebb
|
SS
|
DS1
|
Action
|
15
May 2013
|
Flood
|
SS
|
WSR46
|
Action
|
23
May 2013
|
Flood
|
SS
|
WSR46
|
Action
|
1.5.5
Action Level exceedances of
Turbidity and SS were recorded at Impact station DS1 during mid-ebb tide on 2
and 6 May 2013. Station DS1 is located
in close proximity to the works area of CMP 1 (ie within 500m from the works
area). Since the exceedances were
recorded at station DS1 and during one tidal period only, it is considered that
the sediment plume, if any, was transient in nature and limited to the close
vicinity of the works area as predicted in the EIA review of the Project ([7]). Hence, the dredging works did
not appear to cause any unacceptable deterioration in water quality.
1.5.6
Exceedances were recorded at stations
DS2, DS3, DS4, DS5, WSR45C and WSR46 on other occasions. These stations are located further away from
the works area of CMP 1 when compared to station DS1 at which the levels of SS
and Turbidity did not exceed the Action and Limit Levels. As such, the exceedances at these stations
(ie DS3, DS4, DS5, WSR45C and WSR46) are not likely to be caused by the
dredging works at CMP 1. It should be
noted that high levels of Turbidity and SS were occasionally recorded during
baseline monitoring which are considered to be sporadic events and
characteristic of water quality in this area of Hong Kong. Therefore, the Action and Limit Level exceedances
may be caused by natural background variation in water quality of the
area.
1.5.7
Overall, the results indicated that
the dredging operations at CMP 1 of SB did not appear to cause any unacceptable
deterioration in water quality during this reporting period. Therefore, no further mitigation measures, except
for those recommended in the Environmental Permit (EP-427/2011/A), are considered necessary for the dredging operations.
1.6
Activities Scheduled for the Next Month
1.6.1
Impact Water Quality Monitoring during Dredging
Operations for CMP 1 will be conducted three times per
week in the next monthly period of June 2013.
The sampling schedule is presented in Annex A.
1.7
Study
Programme
1.7.1
A summary of the Study programme is
presented in Annex C.