Agreement No. CE 23/2012 (EP)
Environmental Monitoring and Audit
for Contaminated Mud Pits to the South of The Brothers
and at East Sha Chau (2012-2017) - Investigation
40th MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT FOR December
2015
1.1.1
Since early 1990s, contaminated sediment ([1]) arising from various
construction works (e.g. dredging and reclamation projects) in Hong Kong has been disposed of at a series of seabed pits
at East of Sha Chau
(ESC). In late 2008, a review indicated
that the existing and planned facilities at ESC would not be able to meet the
disposal demand after 2012. In order to
meet this demand, the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government
(HKSARG) decided to implement a new contained aquatic disposal (CAD) ([2]) facility at the South of The Brothers
(SB CMPs) which had been under consideration for a
number of years.
1.1.2
The environmental acceptability of the construction and
operation of the Project had been confirmed by findings of the associated
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) study completed in 2005 under Agreement No. CE 12/2002(EP) ([3]).
The Director of Environmental Protection (DEP) approved this EIA report
under the Environmental
Impact Assessment Ordinance (Cap. 499) (EIAO) in September 2005 (EIA Register No.: AEIAR-089/2005).
1.1.3
In accordance with the EIA recommendation, prior to
commencement of construction works for the SB CMPs,
the Civil Engineering and Development Department (CEDD) undertook a detailed
review and update of the EIA findings for the SB site ([4]). Findings of the EIA review undertaken in
2009/ 2010 confirmed that the construction and operation of the SB site had
been predicted to be environmentally acceptable.
1.1.4
Environmental
Permits (EPs)
(EP-312/2008/A and EP-427/2011A) were issued by the Environmental
Protection Department (EPD) to the CEDD, the Permit Holder, on 28 November 2008
for ESC CMP V and on 23 December 2011 for SB CMPs,
respectively. Under the requirements of
the EPs, an Environmental
Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) programme as set out in the EM&A Manuals ()
()
is required to be implemented for the CMPs.
1.1.5
The present EM&A programme under Agreement No. CE 23/2012 (EP) covers the dredging,
disposal and capping operations of the SB CMPs
as well as ESC CMPs. Detailed works schedule for both CMPs is shown in Figure 1.1. In December 2015, the following works were
being undertaken at the CMPs:
· Dredging operation at ESC CMP Vd;
· Capping operations at ESC CMP Va; and
· Disposal of contaminated mud at SB CMP 2.
Figure 1.1 Works
Schedule for ESC CMPs and SB CMPs
1.2
Reporting
Period
1.2.1
This 40th
Monthly Progress Report covers the EM&A activities for
the reporting month of December 2015.
1.3
Details
of Sampling and Laboratory Testing Activities
1.3.1
The following monitoring activities have been undertaken for
ESC CMPs in December 2015:
·
Benthic Recolonisation
Studies of CMP IV was
undertaken on 9 December 2015;
·
Water Quality Monitoring During Capping of CMP Va was undertaken on
10 December 2015; and
· Impact Water Quality
Monitoring during Dredging Operations of ESC CMP Vd
was undertaken on 30 December 2015.
1.3.2
The following monitoring activities have been undertaken for
SB CMPs in December 2015:
·
Water Column Profiling of CMP 2 was undertaken on
1 December 2015;
·
Water Quality Monitoring During Capping of CMP 1 was undertaken on 2 December 2015;
·
Benthic Recolonisation
Studies of CMP 1 was undertaken
on 3 December 2015;
·
Pit Specific Sediment Chemistry of CMP 2 was undertaken on
7 December 2015; and
·
Cumulative Impact Sediment Chemistry of SB CMPs were
undertaken on 7 and 8 December 2015;
1.4
Details
of Outstanding Sampling and/or Analysis
1.4.1
No outstanding sampling remained for December 2015.
1.4.2
A
summary of field activities conducted are presented in Annex A. The following laboratory analyses were still in
progress during the preparation of this monthly report and hence are not
presented in this monthly report:
· Laboratory analyses of
sediment samples collected for Pit Specific Sediment Chemistry of SB
CMP 2 in December 2015.
· Laboratory analyses of
sediment samples collected for Cumulative Impact Sediment Chemistry of SB CMPs in December 2015.
1.4.3
The
following laboratory analyses are in progress and will be presented in the
corresponding quarterly report:
· Laboratory analyses of
sediment samples collected for Benthic Recolonisation
Studies of ESC CMP IV and SB CMP 1 in December
2015.
1.5
Brief
Discussion of the Monitoring Results for ESC CMPs
1.5.1
Brief discussion of the
monitoring results of the following activities for ESC CMPs
is presented in this 40th
Monthly Progress Report:
· Impact Water Quality Monitoring
during Dredging Operations of ESC CMP Vd in December 2015; and
·
Water Quality Monitoring During Capping of CMP Va in December 2015.
1.5.2
Impact Water Quality Monitoring during Dredging Operations of ESC CMP Vd – December 2015
1.5.3
Dredging
activities were carried out on 13 - 14,
19 – 21 and 28 – 31 December
2015 during this reporting period. However, as the dredging contractor could not
confirm the works schedule
until the dredger arrived the site and there was insufficient time allowed
for the deployment of the sampling vessel , Impact Water Quality Monitoring during Dredging
Operations of ESC CMP Vd could not be arranged during
the period of 13 – 14 and 19 – 21 December 2015 when dredging was being
conducted. The situation was then
discussed between ET, CEDD and the dredging contractor and it is agreed that the dredging
contractor would confirm the works schedule with ET and CEDD at least one week
before the actual works. The situation
was then rectified and Impact Water Quality Monitoring for Dredging Operations
was conducted on 30 December 2015 to monitor water quality around the ESC CMP Vd during dredging activities on 28 – 31 December
2015. On the survey day, monitoring was
conducted during both mid-ebb and mid-flood tides at two Reference (Upstream)
stations and five Impact (Downstream) stations around the
dredging operations at ESC CMP Vd. Monitoring was also conducted at one
Sensitive Receiver station situated in Ma Wan.
A total of eight (8) stations were monitored and locations of the
sampling stations are shown in Figure 1.2.
1.5.4
Monitoring
results are presented in Table B1 of Annex B. Daily dredging
volume in December 2015 is reported in Annex C. Levels of Dissolved
Oxygen (DO), Turbidity and Suspended Solid (SS) complied with the Action and
Limit Levels (see Table B2 of Annex B for details) set in the Baseline
Monitoring Report ().
1.5.5
The
results indicated that the dredging operations at ESC CMP Vd
did not appear to cause any unacceptable deterioration in water quality during
this reporting period. Therefore, no
further action, except for those recommended in the Environmental Permit (EP-312/2008/A), are
considered necessary for the dredging operations.
1.5.6
Water Quality Monitoring during Capping of ESC CMPs – December 2015
1.5.7
The
monitoring results obtained during
December 2015 sampling in the dry
season have been assessed for compliance with the Water Quality Objectives (WQOs) set by Environmental Protection Department (EPD). This consists of a review of the EPD routine water
quality monitoring data for the wet season period (April to October) of 2005 - 2014 from
stations in the Northwestern Water Control Zone
(WCZ), where the CMPs are located (). For Salinity, the averaged value obtained
from the Reference stations was used for the basis as the WQO. Levels of Dissolved Oxygen (DO) and Turbidity were
also assessed for compliance with the Action and Limit Levels (see Table B2 of Annex B for details). A total of sixteen (16) monitoring stations were sampled in December
2015 as shown in Figure 1.3.
In-situ Measurements
1.5.8
Graphical
presentation of the monitoring results (Temperature, DO, pH, Salinity and Turbidity) is shown in Figures 1-6 of Annex D. Levels of Salinity, DO and pH at all stations
in December 2015 complied with the WQO (Table B3 of Annex B). Level of DO and turbidity also complied
the Action and Limit levels (Table B3 of Annex B).
Laboratory
Measurements for Suspended Solids (SS)
Concentrations of SS complied with the WQO and the
Action and Limit Levels at all stations in December 2015 (Table B3 of Annex B; Figure 7 of Annex D). Further statistical analysis will be
undertaken in the quarterly report to investigate whether the capping operations
at ESC CMPs is causing any unacceptable deterioration
in water quality of the area.
1.6
Brief
Discussion of the Monitoring Results for SB CMPs
1.6.1
Brief discussion of the
monitoring results of the following activities for SB CMPs
is presented in this 40th
Monthly Progress Report:
·
Pit Specific Sediment Chemistry of CMP 2 in November 2015;
·
Water Quality Monitoring During Capping of CMP 1 was in December 2015; and
·
Water Column Profiling of CMP 2 in November 2015.
1.6.2
Pit Specific Sediment Chemistry of CMP 2 – November 2015
1.6.3
Monitoring locations for Pit Specific Sediment Chemistry for CMP 2 are shown in Figure 1.4. A total of six (6)
monitoring stations were sampled in November 2015.
1.6.4
The concentrations of all inorganic contaminants (Arsenic,
Cadmium, Chromium, Copper, Lead, Mercury, Nickel, Silver and Zinc) were lower
than the Lower Chemical Exceedance Level (LCEL) at all stations (Figures 8 and
9 of Annex D).
1.6.5
For organic contaminants,
the concentrations of Total Organic Carbon (TOC) were similar at most stations
and it was observed to be lower at Active Pit station SB-NPBB (Figure
10 of Annex
D). Tributyltin (TBT)
concentrations were observed to be higher at Near Pit station SB-NNBA (Figure
11 of Annex
D). Low and
High Molecular Weight Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs),
Total Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs), 4,4’-dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene
(DDE) and Total dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) concentrations were below
the limit of reporting at most stations, except High Molecular Weight PAHs at Active Pit stations SB-NPBB (Figure
12 of Annex
D).
1.6.6
Overall, there is no
evidence indicating any unacceptable environmental impacts to sediment quality
as a result of the contaminated mud disposal operations at CMP 2 in November 2015. Statistical analysis will be undertaken and
presented in the quarterly report to investigate whether there are any
unacceptable impacts in the area caused by the contaminated mud disposal.
1.6.7
Water Quality Monitoring during Capping of SB CMP 1 – December 2015
1.6.8
The
monitoring results obtained during December
2015 sampling in the dry season have
been assessed for compliance with the WQOs (see Section 1.5.7 for details). Levels of DO and Turbidity were also assessed for
compliance with the Action and Limit Levels (see Table B4 of Annex B for details). A total of fourteen (14) monitoring stations were sampled in December 2015 as
shown in Figure 1.5. Graphical presentation of the monitoring
results is provided in Annex D.
In-situ Measurements
1.6.9
Graphical
presentation of the monitoring results (Temperature, DO, pH, Salinity and
Turbidity) is shown in Figures 13-18 of Annex D. Levels of pH and
Salinity at all stations in December 2015 complied with the WQO (Table
B5 of Annex B; Figures 13-18 of Annex D). DO at all stations
also complied with the WQO and the Action and Limit levels in December 2015 (Table B5 of Annex B; Figure 16 of Annex D). In addition, the levels of
Turbidity at most stations complied with the Action and Limit levels in December
2015, except for Tai Ho Bay 1 station (Table
B5 of Annex B; Figure 14 of Annex D). The exceedance of Limit levels at Tai Ho Bay 1 station was
unlikely to be caused by the capping operation at SB as the levels of Turbidity
complied with the Action and Limit levels at all other stations, including
Impact stations which are located closer to CMP 1.
Laboratory Measurement
1.6.10
Concentrations of SS complied with the WQO (13.5
mg/L for dry season) at Intermediate, Ma Wan, Tai Ho Bay
2 and Sham Shui Kok stations,
but not at Reference,
Impact, Tai Ho Bay 1 and Tai Mo To stations in December 2015 (Table B5 of Annex B; Figure
19 of Annex B).
SS at most stations complied with the Action and Limit
Levels in December 2015, except the exceedance of Tai
Ho Bay 1 station (Table B5 of Annex
B). The exceedance of Action
level at Tai Ho Bay 1 station was unlikely to be caused by the capping
operation at SB as the levels of SS complied with the Action and Limit levels
at all other stations, including Impact stations which are located closer to
CMP 1.
1.6.11
For nutrients, concentrations of Ammonia (NH3)
were relatively similar amongst all
stations (Table B5 of Annex B; Figure
20 of Annex D).
Total Inorganic Nitrogen (TIN) at most stations exceeded the WQO of 0.5
mg/L in December 2015, except Ma Wan (Table
B5 of Annex B; Figure 21 of Annex D). It should be noted
that the North Western WCZ has historically experienced higher
levels of TIN and the exceedances
of TIN WQO at these stations are unlikely to be caused by the capping operation
at CMP 1.
1.6.12
Concentrations of Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5)
were similar at all stations in December 2015
(Table B5 of Annex B; Figure
22 of Annex D).
1.6.13
Statistical analysis will be
undertaken and presented in the quarterly report to investigate whether the
capping operations at CMP 1 is causing any unacceptable impacts in water quality of the
area.
1.6.14
Water Column Profiling of CMP 2 – December 2015
1.6.15
Water Column Profiling was undertaken at a total of two sampling stations
(Upstream and Downstream stations) on 1
December 2015. The monitoring results have been assessed for
compliance with the WQOs (see Section 1.5.7 for details). Levels of DO and Turbidity were also assessed for
compliance with the Action and Limit Levels (see Table B4 of Annex B for details).
In-situ
Measurements
1.6.16
Analyses
of results for December 2015 indicated that levels of Salinity, DO and pH complied with the WQOs at both
Downstream and Upstream stations (Table B6 of Annex B). In
addition, DO and Turbidity at all
stations complied with the Action and Limit Levels (Table
B6 of Annex B).
Laboratory
Measurements for SS
1.6.17
Analyses
of results for December 2015 indicated
that the SS levels complied with
the WQO at Downstream stations. Both
Upstream and Downstream stations complied with the Action and Limit Levels (Table B6 of Annex B).
Overall, the monitoring results indicated that the mud
disposal operation at CMP 2 did not appear to cause any deterioration in water
quality during this reporting period.
1.7
Activities
Scheduled for the Next Month
1.7.1
The following monitoring activities will be conducted in the next
monthly period of January 2016 for SB CMPs:
·
Pit Specific Sediment Chemistry of CMP 2;
·
Routine Water Quality Monitoring of CMP 2;
·
Water Column Profiling of CMP 2; and
·
Demersal Trawling of SB CMPs.
1.7.2
The following monitoring activities will be conducted in the next
monthly period of January 2016 for ESC CMPs:
·
Impact Water Quality Monitoring during Dredging Operations of CMP Vd.
1.7.3
The
sampling schedule is presented in Annex A.
1.8.1
A
summary of the Study programme is presented in Annex E.