|
Agreement No. CE 59/2020 (EP) Environmental Monitoring and Audit for Disposal Facility to the East of Sha Chau (2021- 2026) Investigation |
|
Monthly EM&A Report for Contaminated Mud Pits to the East of Sha
Chau December 2022 |
|
January 2023 |
|
Civil Engineering and Development
Department |
|
|
|
Mott MacDonald 3/F Manulife Place 348 Kwun Tong Road Kwun Tong Kowloon Hong Kong T +852 2828 5757 mottmac.hk |
|
|
%20Dec%202022_Rev%20A_files/image003.jpg)
Issue and Revision Record
|
Revision |
Date |
Originator |
Checker |
Approver |
Description |
|
A |
Jan 2023 |
Various |
Thomas Chan |
Eric Ching |
Revision A of Submission |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Document reference: |
423134 | 06/05/17 | A |
|
Information class: |
Standard |
|
This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose. We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it. |
Contents
1.3 Details of Sampling and Laboratory Testing Activities
1.4 Details of Outstanding Sampling or Analysis
2 Brief Discussion of Monitoring Results for ESC CMP V
2.2 Water Column Profiling of ESC CMP Vb in December 2022
2.2.2 Laboratory Measurements for Suspended Solids (SS)
2.3 Routine Water Quality Monitoring of ESC CMPs in December 2022
2.4 Pit Specific Sediment Chemistry of ESC CMP Vb in December 2022
2.5 Cumulative Impact Sediment Chemistry of ESC CMPs in December 2022
3.1 Activities Scheduled for the Next Reporting Period
Tables
|
Works Schedule for ESC CMP V Works Schedule for ESC CMP V |
Figures
|
Routine & Capping Water Quality Sampling Stations (Flood-Tide) for ESC CMPs |
|
|
Cumulative Impacts Sediment Quality Monitoring Stations for ESC CMPs |
|
|
|
|
Appendices
|
|
|
1
Introduction
1.1
Background
The Civil Engineering and Development Department (CEDD) is managing a number of marine disposal facilities in Hong Kong waters, including the Contaminated Mud Pits (CMPs) to the East of Sha Chau (ESC) for the disposal of contaminated sediment, and various open-sea disposal grounds located to the South of Cheung Chau (SCC), East of Tung Lung Chau (ETLC) and East of Ninepins (ENP) for the disposal of uncontaminated sediment.
Environmental Permits (EPs) (Ref. No. EP-312/2008/A) was issued by the Environmental Protection Department (EPD) to the CEDD, the Permit Holder, on 28 November 2008 for the Project - Disposal of Contaminated Sediment Dredging, Management and Capping of Sediment Disposal Facility at Sha Chau.
Under the requirements of the EP, EM&A programmes which encompass water and sediment chemistry, fisheries assessment, tissue and whole body analysis, sediment toxicity and benthic recolonisation studies as set out in the EM&A Manuals are required to be implemented. EM&A programmes have been continuously carried out during the operation of the CMPs at ESC. A review of the collection and analysis of such environmental data from the monitoring programme demonstrated that there had not been any adverse environmental impacts resulting from disposal activities.[1],[2] The current programme will assess the impacts resulting from dredging, disposal and capping operations of CMP V.
A proposal on the change of number of sample replication of water quality and sediment monitoring as well as combination of routine water quality monitoring and water quality monitoring during capping operation was submitted to EPD and agreed by EPD on 3 December 2020. The proposed changes have been effective for the EM&A activities since December 2020. In early 2022, after implementing the Phase 1 optimisation for at least one year, a further data review was conducted. The monitoring data has been reviewed and demonstrated that the data robustness and representativeness are maintained. Therefore, a technical note presenting the data review results served as a supplementary information was submitted to EPD and presented that Phase 2 optimization of sample replication of water quality and sediment monitoring for the Project will be implemented in 2022. EPD expressed no comment on the review and note the implementation of Phase 2 optimization of sample replication on 18 May 2022, and thus this optimization has been effective for the EM&A activities since July 2022.
The latest sampling schedule is provided in Appendix A.
The present EM&A programme under Agreement No. CE 59/2020 (EP) covers the dredging, disposal and capping operations of the ESC CMP V (see Appendix A for the EM&A programme.) Detailed works schedule for ESC CMP V is shown in Table 1.1. In December 2022, the following works were undertaken:
● Disposal of contaminated mud at ESC CMP Vb; and
● Capping operations at ESC CMP Vd.
Table 1.1: Works Schedule for ESC CMP V
%20Dec%202022_Rev%20A_files/Table1-1%20Works%20Schedule%20for%20ESC%20CMP%20V.JPG){kind=link}
1.2
Reporting Period
This Monthly EM&A Report for Contaminated Mud Pits to the East of Sha Chau December 2022 covers the EM&A activities for the reporting period of December 2022 (from 1 to 31 December 2022).
1.3
Details of
Sampling and Laboratory Testing Activities
The following monitoring activities were undertaken for ESC CMP V during the reporting period:
● Water Column Profiling of ESC CMP Vb;
● Routine Water Quality Monitoring of ESC CMPs;
● Pit Specific Sediment Chemistry of ESC CMP Vb; and
● Cumulative Impact Sediment Chemistry of ESC CMPs.
1.4
Details of
Outstanding Sampling or Analysis
No outstanding sampling remained for December 2022.
2
Brief Discussion of Monitoring
Results for ESC CMP V
2.1
Introduction
This section presents a brief discussion of the results obtained from the following monitoring activities for ESC CMP V during the reporting period:
● Water Column Profiling of ESC CMP Vb;
● Routine Water Quality Monitoring of ESC CMPs;
● Pit Specific Sediment Chemistry of ESC CMP Vb; and
● Cumulative Impact Sediment Chemistry of ESC CMPs.
2.2
Water Column
Profiling of ESC CMP Vb in December 2022
Water Column Profiling was undertaken at a total of two sampling stations (Upstream and Downstream stations) on 6 December 2022. The monitoring results have been assessed for compliance with the Water Quality Objectives (WQOs) set by Environmental Protection Department (EPD). This consists of a review of the EPD routine water quality monitoring data for the dry season period (November to March) of 2011 2020 from stations in the North Western Water Control Zone (WCZ), where the ESC CMPs are located.[3] For Salinity, the averaged value obtained from the Reference (Upstream) station was used for the basis as the WQO. Levels of Dissolved Oxygen (DO) and Turbidity were also assessed for compliance with the Action and Limit Levels (see Table B1 of Appendix B for details).
2.2.1
In-situ Measurements
Analyses of results for December 2022 indicated that levels of Salinity, pH and DO complied with the WQOs at both Downstream and Upstream stations (Table B2 of Appendix B). Levels of DO and Turbidity at all stations complied with the Action and Limit Levels (Tables B1 and B2 of Appendix B).
2.2.2
Laboratory Measurements for Suspended Solids (SS)
Analyses of results for December 2022 indicated that the SS level at both Downstream and Upstream stations complied with the WQO and the Action and Limit Levels (Tables B1 and B2 of Appendix B).
Overall, the monitoring results indicated that the mud disposal operation at ESC CMP Vb did not appear to cause any deterioration in water quality during this reporting period.
2.3
Routine Water
Quality Monitoring of ESC CMPs in December 2022
Routine Water Quality Monitoring of ESC CMPs was undertaken on 1 December 2022. The monitoring results have been assessed for compliance with the WQOs (see Section 2.2 above for details). The monitoring results are shown in Tables B3 and B4 of Appendix B and Figures 1 to 10 of Appendix C. A total of ten (10) monitoring stations were sampled in December 2022 as shown in Figure 2.1.
2.3.1
In-situ Measurements
Graphical presentation of the monitoring results (Temperature, DO, pH, Salinity and Turbidity) is shown in Figures 1 to 6 of Appendix C. Analyses of results indicated that the levels of pH, Salinities and DO complied with the WQOs at all stations in December 2022. The levels of DO and Turbidity complied with the Action and Limit Levels at all stations (Table B3 of Appendix B; Figures 3 and 6 of Appendix C).
Overall, in-situ measurement results of the Routine Water Quality Monitoring indicated that the disposal and capping operation at ESC CMPs did not appear to cause any unacceptable impacts in water quality in December 2022.
2.3.2
Laboratory Measurements
Laboratory analysis of samples obtained during the reporting period indicated that the concentrations of Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium, Copper, Lead, Mercury, Nickel, Silver and Zinc were detected in the samples at all stations. The concentrations of Arsenic, Cadmium, Copper, Mercury, Nickel, Silver and Zinc were generally similar across stations; the concentrations of Lead were higher at Intermediate stations; and the concentrations of Chromium were higher at Ma Wan station. (Table B4 of Appendix B; Figure 7 and 8 of Appendix C).
For nutrients, concentrations of Total Inorganic Nitrogen (TIN) were slightly higher than the WQO (0.5 mg/L) at Reference (RFF), Impact (IPF) and Intermediate (INF) stations. (Table B5 of Appendix B; Figure 9 of Appendix C). It should be noted that due to the effect of the Pearl River, the North Western WCZ has historically experienced higher levels of TIN.[4] Therefore, the exceedances of TIN WQO at these stations are unlikely to be caused by the disposal operation at ESC CMPs. The concentration of Ammonia Nitrogen (NH3-N) was similar at all stations (Table B5 of Appendix B; Figure 9 of Appendix C). The concentrations of Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5) were similar across stations. (Table B5 of Appendix B; Figure 10 of Appendix C).
Analyses of results for the reporting period indicated that the SS levels complied with the Action and Limit Levels at all stations, while SS level were higher than the dry season WQO (13.1 mg/L) at Reference (RFF) stations, where Reference stations are located at upstream of the ESC CMPs and thus this is considered to be presenting the background water quality condition during the time of sampling. (Tables B1 and B5 of Appendix B; Figure 11 of Appendix C).
Based on the available results of the Routine Water Quality Monitoring which indicated that the disposal and capping operation at ESC CMPs did not appear to cause any unacceptable deterioration in water quality during the reporting period. Detailed statistical analysis will be presented in the Quarterly EM&A Report to investigate any spatial and temporal trends of potential concern.
2.4
Pit Specific Sediment Chemistry of ESC CMP Vb in December 2022
Monitoring locations for Pit Specific Sediment Chemistry for ESC CMP Vb are shown in Figure 2.2. A total of six (6) monitoring stations were sampled on 2 December 2022.
The concentrations of most inorganic contaminants were lower than the Lower Chemical Exceedance Levels (LCELs) at some/ all stations, except for Arsenic. The concentrations of Arsenic were higher than the LCEL at Near-Pit station ESC-NNCA, Pit-Edge stations ESC-NECA, ESC-NECB and Active-Pit station ESC-NPCA (Figures 12 and 13 of Appendix C).
Whilst the average concentration of Arsenic in the Earths crust is generally ~2mg/kg, significantly higher Arsenic concentrations (median = 14 mg/kg) have been recorded in Hong Kongs onshore sediments.[5] It is presumed that the natural concentrations of Arsenic are similar in onshore and offshore sediments,[6] and relatively high Arsenic levels may thus occur throughout Hong Kong. Therefore, the LCEL exceedances of Arsenic are unlikely to be caused by the disposal operations at ESC CMP Vb but rather as a result of naturally occurring deposits.
For organic contaminants, the concentrations of Total Organic Carbon (TOC) were higher at Near-Pit station ESC-NNCA and Pit-Edge ESC-NECB. (Figure 14 of Appendix C). The concentrations of Low Molecular Weight Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and High Molecular Weight Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) were higher than UCEL (Upper Chemical Exceedance Level) at Active-Pit station ESC-NPCA (Figure 15 of Appendix C). The concentrations of Tributyltin (TBT), Total Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs), Total dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT) and 4,4-dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE) were below the limit of reporting at all stations during the reporting period.
Considering that the higher levels of Low Molecular Weight and High Molecular Weight PAHs occurred within Active-Pit stations ESC-NPCA only, there is no evidence indicating any unacceptable environmental impacts to sediment quality outside the pit area as a result of the contaminated mud disposal operations at ESC CMP Vb during the reporting period.
Statistical analysis will be undertaken and presented in the corresponding Quarterly EM&A Report to investigate whether there are any unacceptable impacts in the area caused by the contaminated mud disposal.
2.5
Cumulative Impact Sediment Chemistry of ESC CMPs in
December 2022
Monitoring locations for Cumulative Impact Sediment Chemistry for ESC CMPs are shown in Figure 2.3. A total of nine (9) monitoring stations were sampled on 5 December 2022.
Analyses of results for the Cumulative Impact Sediment Chemistry Monitoring indicated that the concentrations of most inorganic contaminants were below the LCEL at most stations during the reporting period, except concentrations of Arsenic were higher than the LCEL at Near-field stations ESC-RNA, ESC-RNB1, Mid-field station ESC-RMA and Far-field stations ESC-RFA, ESC-RFB (Figures 16 and 17 of Appendix C). As discussed in Section 2.4, the LCEL exceedances of Arsenic are unlikely to be caused by the disposal operations at ESC CMP Vb but rather as a result of naturally occurring deposits.
For organic contaminants, the concentration of TOC was higher at Mid-field station ESC-RMA, Far-field station ESC-RFB and Ma Wan station MW1 (Figure 18 of Appendix C). The concentrations of High Molecular Weight PAHs were higher at Far-field station ESC-RFA (Figure 19 of Appendix C). The concentrations of TBT were higher at Ma Wan station MW1 (Figure 20 of Appendix C). The concentrations of Total PCBs, Total DDT, 4,4-DDE and Low Molecular Weight PAHs were below the limit of reporting at all stations during the reporting period.
Overall, there is no evidence indicating any unacceptable environmental impacts to sediment quality as a result of the contaminated mud disposal operations at ESC CMP Vb during the reporting period. Statistical analysis will be undertaken and presented in the corresponding Quarterly EM&A Report to investigate whether there are any unacceptable impacts in the area caused by the contaminated mud disposal.
3
Future Key Issues
3.1
Activities Scheduled for the Next Reporting Period
The following monitoring activities will be conducted in the next reporting period of January 2023 for ESC CMP V (see Appendix A for the sampling schedule):
● Water Column Profiling of ESC CMP Vb;
● Routine Water Quality Monitoring of ESC CMPs;
● Pit Specific Sediment Chemistry of ESC CMP Vb; and
● Demersal Trawling for ESC CMPs.
3.2
Study Programme
A summary of the Study Programme is presented in Appendix D.
[1] ERM (2013) Final Report. Submitted under Agreement No. CE 4/2009 (EP) Environmental Monitoring and Audit for Contaminated Mud Pit at East Sha Chau. For CEDD.
[2] ERM (2017) Final Report. Submitted under Agreement No. CE 23/2012 (EP) Environmental Monitoring and Audit for Contaminated Mud Pits to the South of The Brothers and at East Sha Chau (2012 - 2017). For CEDD.
[4] http://www.epd.gov.hk/epd/misc/marine_quality/1986-2005/textonly/eng/index.htm
[5] Sewell RJ (1999) Geochemical Atlas of Hong Kong. Geotechnical Engineering Office, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
[6] Whiteside PGD (2000) Natural geochemistry and contamination of marine sediments in Hong Kong. In: The Urban Geology of Hong Kong (ed. Page A & Reels SJ). Geological Society of Hong Kong Bulletin No. 6, p109-121