Agreement
No. CE 23/2012 (EP)
Environmental Monitoring and Audit
for Contaminated Mud Pits at the South of The Brothers and at East
Sha Chau (2012-2017) - Investigation
10TH
MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT FOR JUNE 2013
1.1.1
Since early 1990s, contaminated
sediment ([1])
arising from various construction works in Hong Kong has been disposed of at a series of seabed
pits at East of Sha Chau (ESC). In
late 2008, a review indicated that the existing and planned facilities at ESC
would not be able to meet the disposal demand after 2012. In order to meet this demand, the Hong
Kong Special Administrative Region Government (HKSARG) decided to implement a
new contained aquatic disposal (CAD) ([2])
facility at the South of The Brothers (SB CMPs) (hereafter
referred to as ¡§the Project¡¨) which had been under consideration for a number
of years.
1.1.2
The environmental acceptability of
the construction and operation of the Project had been confirmed by findings of
the associated Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) study completed in 2005
under
Agreement No. CE 12/2002(EP) ([3]). The Director of Environmental Protection
(DEP) approved this EIA report under the Environmental Impact
Assessment Ordinance (Cap. 499)
(EIAO)
in September 2005 (EIA Register No.: AEIAR-089/2005).
1.1.3
In accordance with the EIA
recommendation, prior to commencement of construction works for the SB CMPs,
the Civil Engineering and Development Department (CEDD) undertook a detailed
review and update of the EIA findings for the SB site ([4]). Findings of the EIA review undertaken in
2009/ 2010 confirmed that the construction and operation of the SB site had
been predicted to be environmentally acceptable.
1.1.4
An Environmental Permit
(EP-427/2011)
was issued by the Environmental Protection Department (EPD) to the CEDD, the
Permit Holder, on 3 November 2011 and varied on 23 December 2011 (EP-427/2011/A). Under the requirements of Condition 4
of the
EP (EP-427/2011/A), an Environmental Monitoring
and Audit (EM&A) programme as set out in the EM&A Manual ()
is required to be implemented for the SB CMPs. The present EM&A programme
undertaken under Agreement No. CE 23/2012 (EP) covers the dredging, disposal
and capping operations of the SB CMPs.
1.2
Reporting Period
1.2.1
This Monthly Progress Report covers
the EM&A activities for the reporting month of June 2013.
1.3
Details of Sampling and
Laboratory Testing Activities
1.3.1
Impact Water Quality Monitoring during Dredging
Operations of CMP 1 was conducted three times per week (ie 4, 6, 8, 11,
13, 15, 17, 20, 24, 26 and 28 June 2013) in this reporting month in accordance
with the EM&A Manual. It should
be noted that the Impact Water Quality Monitoring during Dredging Operations of
CMP 1 was not conducted on 22 June 2013 due to the adverse weather and Typhoon
signal No. 3 was hoisted.
1.4.1
No outstanding
sampling remained from June 2013. A
summary of field activities conducted are presented in Annex A.
1.5.1
Monitoring data collected for SB
CMPs from 27 May to 28 June 2013 are presented in this monthly report. Detailed discussion will be presented in
the corresponding Quarterly Report.
1.5.2
Impact Water
Quality Monitoring during Dredging Operations of CMP 1 ¡V May and June 2013
1.5.3
Impact Water Quality Monitoring during Dredging
Operations of CMP 1 was conducted three times per week for a total of
fourteen (14) sampling days from 27 May to 28 June 2013. On each survey day, sampling was
conducted during both mid-ebb and mid-flood tides at two Reference (Upstream)
stations upstream and five Impact (Downstream) stations downstream of the
dredging operations at CMP 1.
Monitoring was also conducted at five Sensitive Receiver Stations (Ma
Wan, Shum Shui Kok, Tai Mo To and Tai Ho Bay). A total of twelve stations were
monitored and locations of the sampling stations are shown in Figure 1.1.
1.5.4
Monitoring results from 27 May to 28
June 2013 are presented in Table B1 of Annex B. It should be noted that sampling at
station THB2 during mid-ebb tide on 11 June 2013 and during mid-flood tides on
15 and 24 June 2013 were not carried out due to adverse weather. Levels of Dissolved Oxygen (DO),
Turbidity and Suspended Solids (SS) at most of the stations generally complied
with the Action and Limit Levels (see Table B2 for
details) set in the Baseline Monitoring Report (),
except for the following occasions of exceedances shown in Table 1.1
below.
Table 1.1 Details
of exceedances recorded at CMP 1 between 27 May and 28 June 2013
Date
|
Tide
|
Parameter
|
Station
|
Type
|
27 May 2013
|
Mid-Ebb
|
Turbidity
|
WSR46
|
Action
|
6 June 2013
|
Mid-Flood
|
Turbidity
|
WSR45C
|
Action
|
11 June 2013
|
Mid-Flood
|
SS
|
THB2
|
Action
|
13 June 2013
|
Mid-Ebb
|
Turbidity
|
DS1
|
Action
|
13 June 2013
|
Mid-Ebb
|
SS
|
DS1
|
Limit
|
15 June 2013
|
Mid-Ebb
|
SS
|
DS1
|
Limit
|
15 June 2013
|
Mid-Ebb
|
SS
|
THB1
|
Limit
|
20 June 2013
|
Mid-Flood
|
SS
|
WSR46
|
Action
|
24 June 2013
|
Mid-Ebb
|
Turbidity
|
THB2
|
Action
|
24 June 2013
|
Mid-Ebb
|
SS
|
THB2
|
Limit
|
24 June 2013
|
Mid-Flood
|
SS
|
WSR46
|
Action
|
26 June 2013
|
Mid-Flood
|
SS
|
DS4
|
Action
|
1.5.5
Action/Limit Level exceedances of
Turbidity and SS were recorded at Impact station DS1 during mid-ebb tide on 13
and 15 June 2013. Since station DS1
is located in close proximity to the works area of CMP 1 (ie at the boundary of
the works area) and the exceedances were recorded during one tidal period only,
it is considered that the sediment plume, if any, was transient in nature and
limited to the close vicinity of the works area as predicted in the EIA review
of the Project ([7]). Hence, the dredging works did not appear
to cause any unacceptable deterioration in water quality.
1.5.6
Exceedances were recorded at
stations DS4, THB1, THB2, WSR45C and WSR46 on other occasions. These stations are located further away
from the works area of CMP 1 when compared to station DS1 at which the levels of
SS and Turbidity did not exceed the Action and Limit Levels during the same
tidal period. As such, the
exceedances at these stations (ie DS4, THB1, THB2, WSR45C and WSR46) are not
likely to be caused by the dredging works at CMP 1. In addition, THB2 is located downstream
of Tai Ho Stream which will be influenced by the erosion of uphill sediments
during heavy rain. It should be
noted that high levels of Turbidity and SS were occasionally recorded during
baseline monitoring which are considered to be sporadic events and
characteristic of water quality in this area of Hong Kong. Therefore, the Action and Limit Level
exceedances may be caused by natural background variation in water quality of
the area.
1.5.7
Overall, the results indicated that
the dredging operations at CMP 1 of SB did not appear to cause any unacceptable
deterioration in water quality during this reporting period. Therefore, no further mitigation
measures, except for those recommended in the Environmental Permit (EP-427/2011/A),
are considered necessary for the dredging operations.
1.6
Activities Scheduled for the
Next Month
1.6.1
Impact Water Quality Monitoring during Dredging
Operations for CMP 1 will be conducted three times per
week in the next monthly period of July 2013. The sampling schedule is presented in Annex A.
1.7.1
A summary of the Study programme is
presented in Annex C.